The principal methodological mandate involves some form of participation among interested subjects, groups or communities in the research process.
The goal is to carry out the research such that a specified group of people can actively participate, thereby learning research skills themselves, contributing to the data collection, taking an active role in the process of knowledge creation. Interpretation and analysis of the data : Here again the emphasis is on making the data analysis partly a collective endeavor, especially involving those who have been active participants in the research process.
If the research is being carried out in connection with an organization, this kind of collective analysis will naturally follow.
The assumption is that one or more groups of people—especially those with whom particular affinities have developed—are interested in receiving the knowledge we have produced, in forms that will be useful to them.
This requirement is especially challenging for academics, who often prefer prose that is only intelligible to others in their clan. The challenge deepens if we resist the dichotomy between the empirical bottom-line for them and the theoretical repercussions for us , and attempt to communicate generalized or theoretical findings in an educational and useful form.
Validation of the research results : This component diverges most radically from conventional social science research, and therefore is bound to be the most controversial. According to conventional assumptions, validation occurs through review often anonymous by the community of scholars with expertise and experience in the particular area of research.
This validation process has great intrinsic strengths and value that cannot be discounted. Is the knowledge useful? If so, to whom?
Although the question can and should be posed in general terms, it also comes in a more pointed form, since the activist research project will previously have identified a group of people who are specifically motivated to learn and use what the researcher purports to have found out. It is the difference between the momentary sting of critique from fellow colleagues, and the grave responsibility of having a direct and demonstrable impact on the lives of people and on a given political processes.
It is an explicit invitation to put our training and expertise in the hands of an organization, a community or a group of positioned individuals, identifying a problem together with them, and using a participatory research process to study it. While there are no guarantees that the outcome will be successful or even constructive, if our goal is for the research to have tangible and practical impact we need scholars who are willing to forgo the relative security of conventional methods and accept the risks of innovation.
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later. Citations per year. Duplicate citations. The following articles are merged in Scholar. Their combined citations are counted only for the first article. Merged citations. Joseph Valencia. Michael Gomez. Maliko Mudenda. Sajith Prasanga. DBP vs. Register of Deeds of Nueva Ecija. Nash Ledesma. Ferdinand Uy.
Mano Felix. Kling King. Saurabh Shukla. View 2 excerpts, references background and methods. This article analyses the causes of the disparity in collective rights gained by indigenous and Afro-Latin groups in recent rounds of multicultural citizenship reform in Latin America. Instead of … Expand. International law and indigenous peoples. Historical antecedents and their contemporary significance: Greg Marks, indigenous peoples in international law - the significance of Francisco de Vitoria and Bartolome de las Casas Douglas Sanders, … Expand.
View 1 excerpt, references background. On Ethnographic Authority 2. Highly Influential. View 4 excerpts, references background. Using cultural anthropology to analyze debates that reverberate throughout the human sciences, George E. Marcus and Michael M. Fischer look closely at cultural anthropology's past accomplishments, … Expand.
Resistance has become in recent years a popular focus for work in the human sciences. Despite the theoretical sophistication of many anthropological and historical studies of everyday resistance, … Expand. Related Papers. Abstract Citations 29 References Related Papers.
0コメント