Futile treatment has been debated for years by clinicians, ethicists and legal consultants, but experts have recently highlighted the need to increase public engagement in this discussion, said lead author Dr. International medical experience has shown that for some people who are frail and older or who have high - risk conditions, aggressive care has not been effective. The pursuit of non-beneficial treatment can also result in decreased availability of care for other patients, Neville said, which makes understanding the concept of inappropriate intensive-care treatment especially critical.
The researchers conducted focus groups with 39 participants age d 18 and older who either had hospitalized relatives or had been hospitalized themselves. None were trained in the medical field. Participants initially had difficulty understanding the concept of potentially inappropriate treatment and said the current nomenclature was inadequate. Giving more time on life support may be appropriate, if the goals of doing so are made clear.
We can tell. This interpretation of movement as an indication of intention is understandable, given that body language normally is an indication of awareness. Care teams should avoid trying to dissuade families from this view. Their natural response may be to avoid engaging the topic or steering the family towards their spiritual care colleagues. While spiritual care is a valuable resource, the care team can ask follow-up questions that will help provide insight into what the family is hoping for.
Patience is needed on both sides to try to understand what is being said and not said. Clinicians can help avoid miscommunication by thinking carefully about how they are presenting information and avoiding stock phrases that create more confusion than clarity. Families can help by asking clinicians to explain what they mean by some of these stock phrases and trying to be open to hearing bad news when delivered compassionately.
Want to learn more about medical futility? Check out our upcoming Grand Rounds on Monday, Dec. Cooley Auditorium at Baylor St. Instead, the obligations of physicians are limited to offering treatments that are consistent with professional standards of care and that confer benefit to the patient. Generally the term medical futility applies when, based on medical data and professional experience, a treating health care provider determines that an intervention is no longer beneficial.
What if the patient or family requests an intervention that the health care team considers futile? You have a duty as a physician to communicate openly with the patient or family members about interventions that are being withheld or withdrawn and to explain the rationale for such decisions. It is important to approach such conversations with compassion.
For example, rather than saying to a patient or family, "there is nothing I can do for you," it is important to emphasize that "everything possible will be done to ensure the patient's comfort and dignity. In some instances, it may be appropriate to continue temporarily to make a futile intervention available in order to assist the patient or family in coming to terms with the gravity of their situation and reaching closure.
For example, a futile intervention for a terminally ill patient may in some instances be continued temporarily in order to allow time for a loved one arriving from another state to see the patient for the last time. If intractable conflict arises, a fair process for conflict resolution should occur. Involvement of an ethics consultation service is desirable in such situations. The Texas Advance Directives Act provides one model for designing a fair process for conflict resolution.
Futility refers to the benefit of a particular intervention for a particular patient. With futility, the central question is not, "How much money does this treatment cost? What is the difference between a futile intervention and an experimental intervention? Making a judgment of futility requires solid empirical evidence documenting the outcome of an intervention for different groups of patients.
Futility establishes the negative determination that the evidence shows no significant likelihood of conferring a significant benefit.
0コメント